Independent research findings rank Golf as average reliability-wise, and 308 is more or less at the same level.Above it all, drivers of cars with the same engine as the German car rank it on average as 4.7, while the one under the competitor's bonnet gets 4.3 out of 5. Performance & Fuel economy

PEUGOET 308 SW Avant garde cabin design Generous boot space Punchy powertrain VOLKSWAGEN GOLF VARIANT Technologically advanced cabin Pliant and comfortable ride Smooth powertrain The Peugeot 308 SW is more affordable and a little more spacious but the Volkswagen Golf Variant's technologically-advanced cabin and better ride is hard to ignore. Stationwagons, or estates, whichever you prefer terming them, haven't had much success on our shores. Despite being the go-to family vehicle for Europeans for decades, us Asians have always had an aversion to them, due to their resemblance to should we really let our outdated superstitions get in the way of practicality? We think not, especially when the latest crop of wagons available are more stylish than their hatchback siblings. The updated Golf Variant returns to find itself amongst strong competition in the form of the Peugeot 308 SW Two of our favourites so far remain the Volkswagen Golf Variant, which has recently been refreshed, and its stylish French rival, the Peugeot 308 SW. So if you're a forward-thinker who's looking for a good-looking European people carrier, the question, then, is - which of these two should you get? First impressionsIf you're someone who likes going against the norm (you must be, since you're considering a wagon) and standing out from the crowd, you might prefer the 308 SW for several of which is the way its cabin has been styled, which is entirely unconventional compared to the Golf Variant's teutonic approach. In the 308, the instrument cluster sits atop the dash, instead of in it, which is cool even if it does take some getting used to. The Golf Variant offers a more technologically advanced and user-friendly experience There's also a much cleaner design inside the 308 SW, which does away with most of the conventional buttons on the centre console. That form, however, has a slight functional disadvantage as conducting simple actions like adjusting the air-conditioning the other hand, the Golf Variant's sharper, albeilt smaller-sized Discover Pro infotainment has a more intuitive interface. Coupled with its high-resolution, digital Active Info Display cluster, it offers a more technologically advanced experience, even if its overall cabin design isn't as avant garde. The 308 SW's 660-litre boot offers 55 litres of cargo space more than the Golf Variant's At $129,900 (as of 15 November 2018), the extra $20,901 for the Golf Variant also gets you more cubbyholes, an electrically adjusted driver's seat, paddle shifters and rear air-conditioning. Both cars are equipped with Apple CarPlay and Android Auto while both cars do offer enough space for a family of five, the 308's larger size and longer wheelbase do mean there is a tad more rom for those riding at the back. It also has a larger 660-litre boot with the rear seats up, outsizing the Golf's 605 litres. Still, unless you're a fairly large person, which most of us Asians aren't, there is enough room in the Golf to feel comfortable on long drives. Speaking of drives…It comes as quite a surprise that the Golf Variant, as the car with one more cylinder and a larger engine, has a lower power output. Its turbocharged four-banger churns 123bhp and 200Nm of torque while the 308 SW's boost three-cylinder makes 129bhp and 230Nm of torque. The 308 SW may have a smaller capacity engine and one less cylinder but it has a higher output of 129bhp and 230Nm of torque Thankfully, with an extra gear and closer gear ratios to help with acceleration and top speed, the Golf Variant is quicker in a straight line to 100km/h, taking seconds. The 308 SW trails behind slightly, with a century sprint timing of terms of ride quality, the Golf Variant is slightly plusher and more settled over bumps and ruts. But if you prefer a car that offers quicker direction changes and a meatier steering, the 308 SW feels like the sportier one to have. The Golf Variant's extra seventh gear helps with straight-line performance, resulting in a century sprint that's faster than the more powerful Peugeot Sounds like a tie, then?The 308 SW is the more emotional purchase, with its design and the way it drives. Yet, it also offers a little more room all around with a lower $108,999 (as of 15 November 2018) price tag and a cheaper annual road tax of $508 versus the Golf Variant's $ always, the Golf Variant has a lot to lose going up against a competitor as strong as this Peugeot. And this time, the 308 SW is seemingly the one that offers more bang for buck. Whether its the more avant garde 308 or the more tech-savvy Golf Variant you prefer, they prove wagons deserve more attention But if you are a sucker for digitally-advanced cabins, better ride quality, lighter-footed performance and that aggressive R-Line kit, you'll have to be prepared to pay the premium for the Golf way, these two prove that before you jump on a deal for a sport utility vehicle, you should first give wagons a second look.

Can't Decide Between Two Cars? 2022 Volkswagen Golf 1.0 eTSI vs 2022 Peugeot 308 1.2 PureTech - Side-by-Side Comparison. Explore design, practicality, price, features, engine, transmission, fuel consumption, driving, safety, and ownership aspects of both models. Our experts provide you with a verdict to help you make the right choice.

Skip to ContentSkip to FooterDon’t want a diesel family hatch? We test the top petrol choices as Peugeot’s revised 308 battles the VW Golf and Honda Civic31 Jan 2018As diesel continues to be demonised, there’s a growing trend of buyers making the switch to petrol power. From superminis to SUVs, efficient, downsized turbo petrol engines are putting forward a case for themselves, but the evergreen family hatchback is one of the sectors where they make most is one of the most competitive areas of the new car market, and as a result the models available are constantly getting better – as proven by the trio of great cars we’re testing here.• Best hatchbacks on saleThe latest Peugeot 308 is the newest of the three, and while its recent facelift was only mild, the French hatch continues to offer a top mix of space, comfort and equipment. Then there’s the Volkswagen Golf. It was updated last year with some new tech and a subtle revised look, just like the Peugeot, but here we’re testing the latest 128bhp petrol version for the first time. It goes up against the proven PureTech three-cylinder petrol 308, but it also faces competition from Honda in the form of its Civic, which has a unit that matches the other cars for you don’t want to buy a diesel due to fears about taxation in the future, these are three compelling choices. But which one comes out on top? Peugeot 308Model:Peugeot 308 PureTech 130 GT LinePrice: £22,390Engine: 3cyl petrol, 129bhp 0-60mph: secondsTest economy: CO2: 120g/km Annual road tax: £140The Peugeot 308 has been around since 2014, but a facelift in 2017 brought it back up to date with revised infotainment and some subtle exterior changes. Here we’re testing the 129bhp petrol model in GT Line trim, which costs from £22, reviews All three of our contenders here have just under 130bhp on tap, but the 129bhp Peugeot is the most powerful choice, by just 1bhp, and has the most torque at 230Nm; the Civic and the Golf both serve up helped the 308 to sprint from 0-60mph at the test track in seconds, which was a tenth faster than the Golf and six tenths up on the Civic. This advantage is also partly down to a low kerbweight of just 1,089kg, compared with the Golf’s 1,280kg and the Civic’s 1, it wasn’t the best performer going up through the gears: the 308 took seconds to cover 30-70mph, slightly slower than the Honda’s seconds and the Golf’s seconds. It also matched the heavier Honda from 30-50mph in fourth and 50-70mph in fifth: both cars took seconds and seconds respectively, while the Golf completed those tests in seconds and if the French model’s six-speed box isn’t the nicest to use, it’s no chore to drop down a gear and accelerate with the 308’s three-cylinder unit. It’s definitely the most engaging engine of the three in this test as it feels more responsive and revvier, while also serving up good mid-range 308’s low kerbweight helps its handling. Its quick steering and that small wheel contribute towards a relatively nimble feel, but there’s not much feedback with the Peugeot and the chassis isn’t as grippy as the Honda’ closer to the Golf’s more neutral feel, but ultimately the 308 ends up in between the more comfortable Golf and sportier Civic. The difference really is minimal, though, and all three models are comfy enough, but can still satisfy keen notes: “Despite infotainment system updates, Peugeot hasn’t fixed one of the unit’s major flaws: the laggy screen that controls the heating and ventilation, which isn’t separate to the rest of the set-up.” Volkswagen Golf Model:Volkswagen Golf TSI EVO 130 SE Nav 5drPrice: £22,255Engine: 4cyl petrol, 128bhp 0-60mph: secondsTest economy: CO2: 113g/kmAnnual road tax: £140The Volkswagen Golf was the second most registered car in Britain in 2017, and it’s easy to see why: the evergreen hatchback is as spacious, comfortable and good to drive as ever. Last year’s facelift added this new engine, updated infotainment and more safety features. Here we’re testing the TSI EVO 130 model in SE Navigation spec, which costs from £22, minor changes to the Golf’s appearance are mirrored in the way it drives, because the VW is comfortable and refined, but also great from behind the TSI engine is a brilliant addition to the range; it’s very quiet, smooth and put in a good showing in our performance tests. It was the fastest car of the three from 30-70mph through the gears, taking seconds to the Honda’s seconds and the 308’s seconds. That’s helped by the sweet six-speed manual’s shift action, whereas you have to be more methodical with the box in the so, the Golf did fall behind the 308 and Civic from 50-70mph in fifth gear, taking seconds, while its rivals both completed the test in seconds. In the real world there’s very little to separate them, however, and all feel punchy don’t need to work the engine too hard to make progress, because maximum torque of 200Nm arrives at just 1,400rpm; much lower than in either competitor. That means the car picks up pace easily without having to shift down, and it also helps keep things quiet inside; it’s one of the TSI’s best aspects, and the Golf is quieter than both rivals as a direct and well weighted steering means the Volkswagen responds well on turn-in, plus there’s plenty of grip and good body control. It’s not quite as engaging to drive quickly as the Honda, but there’s not much in it. The real strength of the Golf is the way it blends that ability with refinement and comfort; it rides more smoothly than the 308 in particular, absorbing bumps in the road surface notes: “The Golf’s TSI engine is the only four-cylinder unit here. It features clever tech that can deactivate two cylinders to help boost efficiency, shown by its low claimed CO2 emissions.” Honda Civic Model:Honda Civic VTEC Turbo EXPrice: £23,615Engine: 3cyl petrol, 127bhp 0-60mph: secondsTest economy: CO2: 117g/kmAnnual road tax: £140The 10th-generation Honda Civic impressed in 2017 thanks to its engaging handling and spacious interior. The sporty Type R version is our favourite hot hatch, and its DNA filters down into this standard model. Here we’re testing the version in EX trim, which starts from £23,615 (although our pictures show an SR model).Honda has followed the industry trend of downsizing its engines for the latest Civic, so this one is powered by a petrol motor with a turbocharger to improve power and torque lower down in the rev range. It’s punchy from 2,250rpm, where the maximum torque is delivered from, and feels able to keep up with its larger-capacity rivals on the road, although it did trail them in some of our performance was half a second slower from 0-60mph than the Golf, with a time of seconds. However, the Honda was only a tenth behind the VW in the 30-70mph sprint and two tenths faster than the 308, helped by that lovely, accurate close figures show that there’s not too much difference in terms of performance between our three rivals, but the Honda does have the advantage here for keen drivers because it’s the most fun low driving position is comfortable and feels sporty, while the steering is well weighted and fast in its response, offering the best feel. There’s lots of grip on offer and the clever torque vectoring technology helps the car hold its line through corners. It’s well controlled in terms of body roll thanks to the dampers’ sportier setting, and the Honda is more agile than either rival in this test as a comfort mode it’s refined and smooth, with a relatively compliant ride, although our noise tests showed the Civic was a little louder at 70mph than its rivals. The turbo sits at higher revs at that speed, which contributes to that extra it’s a willing engine and is more characterful than the Golf’s four-cylinder unit, but not as fun as the in the 308. The manual gearshift is fantastic, and has a precise action that’s better than in almost any other hatchback on sale. Testers’ notes: “The Honda has the smallest fuel tank of the three cars here, at 46 litres. That means you’ll actually end up filling it up more often than the 308, despite its better economy figure.” Verdict First place: Volkswagen GolfIt’s a very close result between these three family hatchbacks, but the Golf is so good in so many areas that it will make the most sense for more people. It’s comfortable, refined, good to drive, well equipped and great value, and the latest infotainment system is one of the best on the market at any price. The Golf manages all that while still being practical enough for most owners. Second place: Honda CivicThe latest Civic isn’t as well rounded as the Golf, while its infotainment system is a real letdown, but it’s more practical and fun to drive than the VW. It finishes ahead of the 308 thanks to lower running costs and engaging handling, while its performance is strong enough to match the 308. Although it’s not as polished as the VW, it’s still refined and comfortable. Third place: Peugeot 308The 308 is practical and stylish, but not as accomplished as the Golf, so it loses out here. It’s not as good to drive as the Civic, and although the list price is competitive, Peugeot’s PCP deals can’t match Honda’s. The PureTech is the best engine of the three and the 308 performed well, but it trails on value, while its updated infotainment isn’t enough of an improvement. Other options in this category... Vauxhall Astra Elite Nav 150PSPrice: £22,135Engine: 4cyl, 148bhpWith its solid driving dynamics, strong comfort and impressive space, the Vauxhall Astra is worth a look. The petrol in Elite Nav trim is good value, because it’s as well kitted out as our pricier test cars. You also get more Megane TCe Signature NavPrice: £21,790Engine: 4cyl, 128bhpThe petrol Megane is a match for the three contenders in our test, and it’s nearly as well equipped as the Astra, too. In addition, the Renault has style on its side, and offers something different again in this class. Figures VW Golf TSI EVO 130 SE Navigation 5drHonda Civic VTEC Turbo EXPeugeot 308 PureTech 130 GT LineOn the road price/total as tested£22,255/£26,140£23,615/£24,140£22,390/£25,835Residual value (after 3yrs/36,000)£9,565/ tax liability std/higher rate£906/£1,812£1,030/£2,059£1,064/£2,127Annual fuel cost (12k/20k miles)£1,865/£3,109£1,497/£2,495£1,714/£2,857Insurance group/quote/road tax cost15/£567/£14015/£1,213/£14018/£595/£140Cost of 1st/2nd/3rd service£164/£309/£164£195/£265/£245£13pm (3yrs) Length/wheelbase4,258/2,620mm4,518/2,697mm4,253/2,620mmHeight/width1,492/1,799mm1,434/1,799mm1,457/1,804mmEngine4cyl in-line/1,498cc3cyl in-line/998cc3cyl in-line/1,199ccPeak power/revs 128/5,000 bhp/rpm127/5,500 bhp/rpm129/5,500 bhp/rpmPeak torque/revs 200/1,400 Nm/rpm200/2,250 Nm/rpm230/1,750 Nm/rpmTransmission 6-spd man/fwd6-spd man/fwd6-spd man/fwdFuel tank capacity/spare wheel50 litres/space saver46 litres/repair kit53 litres/space saverBoot capacity (seats up/down)380/1,270 litres478/1,245 litres470/1,309 litresKerbweight/payload/towing weight1,280/575/1,400kg1,275/427/1,200kg1,089/661/1,300kgTurning metresBasic warranty (miles)/recovery3yrs (60,000)/1yr3yrs (unlimited)/3yrs3yrs (unlimited)/1yrService intervals/UK dealers10,000 miles/(1yr)/22312,500 miles (1yr)/19616,000 miles (1yr)/283Driver Power manufacturer/dealer Adult/child/ped./assist/stars94/89/65/71/5 (2012)92/75/75/88/5 (2017)92/79/64/81/5 (2013) 0-60/ secs30-50mph in 3rd/ secs50-70mph in 5th/ secsTop speed/rpm at 70mph 130mph/2,250rpm126mph/2,500rpm130mph/2,300rpmBraking 70-0/60-0/30-0mph outside/idle/30/70mph61/51/62/71dB59/41/63/72dB64/50/64/71dBAuto Express econ (mpg/mpl)/ milesGovt urban/extra-urban/combined urban/extra-urban/combined CO2/tax bracket184/113g/km/21%148/117g/km/22%170/120g/km/23% Airbags/Isofix/park sensors/cameraSeven/yes/yes/£265Six/yes/yes/yesSix/yes/yes/yesAuto box/stability/cruise control/AEB£1,395/yes/yes/yes£1,400/yes/yes/yes£1,150/y/y/£800^Climate control/leather/heated seats£425/£2,115/£400*Yes/yes/yesY/£1,200/£1,200**Metallic paint/LED lights/keyless go£575/£995/£375£525/£600/yes£525/yes/£350Sat-nav/USB/DAB radio/BluetoothYes/yes/yes/yesYes/yes/yes/yesYes/yes/yes/yesHave you considered?Skoda Fabia: long-term test reviewLong-term testsSkoda Fabia: long-term test reviewFirst report: We head back to the petrol pumps with our new family supermini10 Jul 2022New Skoda Fabia Monte Carlo 2022 reviewRoad testsNew Skoda Fabia Monte Carlo 2022 reviewThe Fabia Monte Carlo is best enjoyed for what it is, a comfortable, refined and capable family car, that rides and steers as well as the VW Group sta…30 Jun 2022Ford Fiesta reviewIn-depth reviewsFord Fiesta reviewThe Fiesta is good fun and remains a solid buy, despite increasingly strong competition 20 Jun 2022Most PopularNew SsangYong Torres unveiled on social mediaNewsNew SsangYong Torres unveiled on social mediaSsangYong’s new Torres will take on the electric SUV market in 202328 Jul 2022Fines not being enforced for drivers in red ‘X’ motorway lanesNewsFines not being enforced for drivers in red ‘X’ motorway lanesPolice forces are failing to enforce red ‘X’ offences on smart motorways as effectively as first hoped, a Government minister has revealed28 Jul 2022New Peugeot e-2008 2022 reviewRoad testsNew Peugeot e-2008 2022 reviewThe all-electric Peugeot e-2008 compact crossover gets extended range as part of updates for 202229 Jul 2022Skip to HeaderSkip to Content

VOTA!!¿Queres formar parte de la MAFIA? ES GRATIS! CLICK AQUI 💣 https://bit.ly/2Wi60eI 💣🔵 🟠 Si te gusto este video, estos te van a ENCANTAR 🟡 🟢🔴 Todos

HOME page / compare / Peugeot 308 SW HDi vs Volkswagen Golf Variant TDI BlueMotion Compare two cars 2013. - 2017. C - Small family car wagon, 5 door front Badges Production Vehicle class Body style Wheel drive Safety 2016. - 2019. C - Small family car wagon, 5 door front Dimensons & Outlines Length Width Height Boot (min) Boot (max) Fuel tank 2013 Peugeot 308 SW 2016 Volkswagen Golf Variant © GAMA1 Solutions. Copying & distribution prohibited. Engine Diesel 4 - Inline, 2 valves per cylinder Turbo Engine Fuel Configuration Aspiration Displacement Power Torque Diesel 4 - Inline, 4 valves per cylinder Turbo Performance (manual gearbox) Gearbox type Vehicle weight Acc. 0-100 Top speed Cons. (urban) Cons. (highway) Cons. (average) CO2 emissions Performance (automatic gearbox) Gearbox type Vehicle weight Acc. 0-100 Top speed Cons. (urban) Cons. (highway) Cons. (average) CO2 emissions Expenses Virtual Adviser's™ opinion Overview Well, these are two pretty similar cars we have here! It's only details that could potentially make the difference. Considering they both belong to the small family car segment and utilize the same 5-door wagon body style and the front wheel drive system, it all comes up to the specific diesel engine choice they offer. The first one has a Peugeot-engineered powertrain under the hood, a 4-cylinder, 8-valves 92hp unit, while the other one gets its power and torque from a 4-cylinder, 16-valves 115hp engine designed by Volkswagen. Safety The first thing to look into here would be the results from European New Car Assessment Programme (Euro NCAP) tests performed on the two cars. Good thing is that both vehicles got tested, with the same number of safety stars gained in the process. Moving further on, let's take a closer look at some additional safety-related facts. Both vehicles belong to the small family car segment, which is generally classifying them somewhere in the middle safety-wise, but it doesn't do much to help us decide between the two. On the other hand, if we'd like to consider vehicle mass in this context too, which we definitely should, the German car offers a considerable difference of 13% more metal. Reliability I don't like generalizing things when it comes to reliability, although it does seem that Peugeot does have a slight advantage, when all the models are taken into account. These are the results of an independent reasearch, while our visitors describe reliability of Peugeot with an average rating of and models under the Volkswagen badge with out of 5. The same official information place 308 as average reliability-wise, and Golf is more or less at the same it all, drivers of cars with the same engine as the French car rank it on average as while the one under the competitor's bonnet gets out of 5. Performance & Fuel economy Volkswagen is undoubtly more agile, reaching 100km/h in seconds less than its competitor. In addition to that it accelerates all the way to 200 kilometers per hour, 19km/h more than the other car. When it comes to fuel economy things look pretty much the same for both cars, averaging around 4 liters of fuel per 100 kilometers (72 mpg), in combined cycle. Verdict Peugeot appears just a bit more reliable, although the difference is truly marginal. The most important thing when deciding between any two vehicles should always be safety, both passive and active. In my opinion, everything taken into account, the German car offers significantly better overall protection, taking the lead here. It all continues in the same direction, with Volkswagen being considerably quicker, thus putting more smile on driver's face. It does come at a cost though, and that's the fuel consumption... No mistake, whatever you decide here, but I'd still go for the Volkswagen. Nevertheless, let's not forget that people have different preferences and needs, so what really counts is your personal feel. I'm only here to help. I suggest you spend two more minutes in order to find out which car, based on your needs and budget, would be picked by the virtual adviser™, among more than different ones in our database. Check a car by its VIN number

ጄакωየοհа գադα
Ωλεδωσօք жօμուֆիጊ եηи
Ωврօγуռ вεхէ
- ሐ угገ ጴծукоտደвድ ктаቨ
- Тፄդዮ ቲнеցιтуእε всυζу
ወκоξе наτаց

Peter Sigal. Compared with the current 308, the new car is 110 mm longer, its wheelbase has increased by 55 mm, and its height has been reduced by 20 mm. Peugeot is electrifying the next

With a cargo volume of 380 liters, the VW Golf has to admit defeat to the Peugeot 308, which with 420 liters is above average for this class. The Mercedes A-Class, on the other hand, offers the smallest section between the taillights and only 341 liters of content, which, as with the others, can be expanded using a split rear seat backrest or Golf ince işleri çok iyi harmanlıyor. Fakat bugün aynı para olsalar bile yine 308 alırım. Bu Golf kötüdür anlamına gelmesin. Kişisel beklentiler ile alakalı bir durum. Bugün 308 den Pejo amblemini sök, al bindir insanları satın almaya razı olacak pek çok insan bulursunuz. e-hdi, bluehdi yeter tek başına.

(Arabic) Comparatif - Peugeot 308 VS Volkswagen Golf - Duel de Championnes (DownSub - Com) Uploaded by Rachid Rachidi. 0 ratings 0% found this document useful (0 votes)

Are you looking to buy a car but can't decide between a Peugeot 308 or Volkswagen Golf? Use our side by side comparison to help you make a decision. We compare design, practicality, price, features, engine, transmission, fuel consumption, driving, safety & ownership of both models and give you our expert verdict. 6.7 l/100km: By specification Peugeot 308 consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Golf, which means that by driving the Peugeot 308 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Peugeot 308 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the